No. 01 · US–Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund · Part one
Fifteen obligations sit in the framework agreement. Ukraine bears twelve of them. The asymmetry is not in the substance — it is in the verbs.
Force of language is assessed from the operative verb. Binding where the text says shall; conditional where performance depends on a term set elsewhere, chiefly the unpublished LP Agreement; non-binding where the text states an expectation, affirmation or plan.
That distinction is the finding. Ukraine's commitments use shall ensure, shall take all steps, shall cause. The United States' use affirms, expresses its expectation, and on contributions plans to.
Obligations by party and force of language
SOURCE: FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT, ARTS. II–XI
The ledger
Borne by Ukraine nine obligations · seven binding
Contribute 50% of specified subsoil revenues, irrevocably
An irrevocable right to the "Ukraine Agreed Revenue" — reported as 50% of royalties, rent payments, licence fees and production-sharing amounts — routed by operation of law through a special fund of the state budget.
Covers licences issued on or after the effective date, plus pre-existing licences not industrially exploited. Reported to span 60-plus minerals including lithium, uranium, titanium, graphite, rare earths, oil and gas.
Subordinate domestic law to the agreement
"in case of any inconsistency between legislation of Ukraine and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail… the Government of Ukraine agrees that it may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for any failure to perform."
A stabilisation clause with no sunset. Future tax, licensing or resource-governance reform cannot be applied to the Partnership if it reduces the treatment guaranteed here.
Legislate as required to implement both agreements
Ukraine shall adopt, maintain and enforce whatever legislation is needed to implement the framework agreement and the LP Agreement — a standing legislative obligation whose content is partly set by a document the legislature has not seen.
Exempt all Partnership income from Ukrainian tax
All income of the Partnership, including income allocable to the US Partner, free of taxes, levies, imposts and duties. This compounds the revenue share: half the gross take forgone, then tax forgone on the vehicle receiving it.
Write Partnership investment rights into every future subsoil licence
Every licence, permit, PSA, PPP and infrastructure agreement must require its holder to disclose investment information to the Partnership when raising capital, negotiate in good faith where the Partnership expresses interest, and grant no third party materially more favourable terms.
A right of first look plus a most-favoured-nation floor, embedded by statute into every future resource transaction in the country.
Write US offtake rights into every future subsoil licence
Licences must let the US Partner negotiate offtake on market-based terms, restrain holders from offering third parties better offtake terms, and carry further counterparty restrictions specified in the unpublished LP Agreement.
Guarantee free hryvnia–dollar convertibility
Conversion and transfer of Partnership payments must occur "without cost, condition, or delay" — a hard-currency obligation on a state under capital controls, and a real modellable cost absent from every summary of the deal.
Indemnify the Partnership for losses caused by its own crisis measures
If a balance-of-payments crisis forces protective restrictions, Ukraine "shall indemnify and hold harmless the Partnership" for the resulting losses — a contingent liability that triggers precisely when the sovereign is least able to pay.
Convert currency during martial law within LP-defined limits
The one wartime relief valve in the currency article, and its size is set by the document that is not public.
Borne by the United States three provisions · none binding in the public text
Make contributions to the Partnership
"Each Party plans to make contributions to the Partnership in accordance with the terms of the LP Agreement."
"Plans to" is the operative verb, and the amount, timing and form sit in the LP Agreement. Ukraine's contribution, by contrast, is mandated in §2 and defined in the same sentence. The asymmetry may be cured in the unpublished document — but a ratifying legislature reading only this text could not have verified it.
Military assistance credited as capital
New US military assistance delivered after the effective date — weapons, ammunition, technology, training — increases the US capital contribution by its assessed value, deemed automatically.
This is not an obligation on the US; it is a conversion mechanism in its favour. Aid already being supplied for other reasons accrues equity in a vehicle holding a perpetual claim on Ukrainian resource revenue. The valuation basis is the central unknown in the structure.
Tariff forbearance on offtake product
the United States "expresses its expectation that it would not impose tariffs" under Section 232 or the IEEPA on articles obtained through the offtake rights.
An expectation, not a commitment, and not a waiver of either authority. The commercial value of the offtake rights stays exposed to a unilateral US trade action this clause does not prevent.
Structural terms governance, duration, dispute resolution
Disputes resolved by mutual consultation only
No arbitral forum, no governing law, no adjudication. Where the parties disagree and consultation fails, the text provides no remedy — which in practice favours the party with more leverage outside the agreement.
Indefinite term, no unilateral exit
In force until the Parties agree to terminate. Combined with Art. II §3, the agreement outlives any Ukrainian government and cannot be legislated away or unilaterally ended.
Equal governance, 50–50 voting
Widely reported, but not established by the public framework text, which defers governance to the LP Agreement. Equal voting and equal economics are different things — with capital accruing to one side automatically under Art. VI §5, a fixed 50–50 vote does not imply a fixed 50–50 claim on distributions.
Unknowns register
What could not be determined from public documents, and what would resolve it. Every item is required before a cash-flow model can produce a return rather than a range.
| Unknown | Would be resolved by |
|---|---|
| Distribution waterfall and reinvestment rules Order of payment, and whether distributions are suspended during a reinvestment window. | LP Agreement, distribution article |
| Valuation basis for military assistance Acquisition cost, replacement cost or assessed market value — and who assesses it. Sets the dilution rate. | LP Agreement, capital contributions |
| US cash contribution, if any Amount, schedule and conditions precedent. The public text commits to none. | LP Agreement · DFC board documents |
| Exact perimeter of "Ukraine Agreed Revenue" The 50% figure and licence scope are consistently reported but come from secondary sources; Appendix A was not published. | Appendix A · Rada ratification file |
| Martial-law conversion limits The cap on hryvnia–dollar conversion during wartime, which bounds the near-term hard-currency drain. | LP Agreement, per Art. V §3 |
| Offtake counterparty restrictions Which buyers licence holders may not sell to. Bears on whether Ukrainian producers can serve EU customers freely. | LP Agreement, per Art. VIII |
This is a complete account of the obligations created by the public framework agreement. It is not an account of the deal's returns, because the returns are defined in the LP Agreement between the DFC and Ukraine's public-private partnership agency, which has not been published.
That is itself the most publishable finding here. A legislature ratified a perpetual, non-terminable, law-overriding revenue assignment whose payout terms it did not see. Any analysis claiming to know whether Ukraine got a good deal — in either direction — is working from the same incomplete record this ledger is.
Sources
Clause quotations from the full agreement text published by the Kyiv Independent. Appendix A was not included in that publication, so the scope and percentage of the Ukraine Agreed Revenue are taken from secondary reporting and marked accordingly. Wider programme context from EITI.